Showing posts with label science history. Show all posts
Showing posts with label science history. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 3, 2024

The Sun Kings - Stuart Clark

   2007; 189 pages.  Full Title: The Sun Kings: The Unexpected Tragedy of Richard Carrington and the Tale of How Modern Astronomy Began.  New Author? : Yes.  Genres : Astronomy; Non-Fiction; Science History; Biographies.  Overall Rating : 9½*/10.

 

    Let’s see if you’re as resourceful as an astronomer named William Herschel.

 

    The year is 1801.  Herschel is already well-known in his field for all sorts of discoveries using his state-of-the-art telescopes, including the planet Uranus.  However, he’s now investigating sunspots, using an indirect method that avoids staring directly into the Sun and burning one’s eyes out.

 

    Herschel finds that sunspots vary in number and intensity over time.  What effect does that have on Earth’s weather?  When there’s a period of time where there are no sunspots, will the Earth be warmer than normal, cooler, or stormier?

 

    Watching sunspots is nothing new.  Astronomers have been doing that since Galileo invented the telescope, back in the 1600s.  A number of “low sunspot periods” have been chronicled since 1650, lasting anywhere from 2 to 20 years each.

 

    Unfortunately, nobody’s been recording the daily temperatures throughout the world yet, so how can Herschel correlate global weather conditions for the past century-and-a-half with sunspot activity?  Can you figure out a way?

 

    The answer is given at the end of this review.

 

What’s To Like...

    The Sun Kings is an ambitious half-&-half blend of biography and astronomy genres.  It covers the time span of 1795 to the present, with most of the focus on the 19th century.  The Richard Carrington mentioned in the subtitle is the main biographical subject, but other astronomers share some time in the spotlight too, including William Herschel, his son John Herschel, Edward Walter Maunder, and the enthusiastic but eccentric Elias Loomis cited below.

 

    Mixing details of the astronomers’ personal lives with their scientific endeavors seems a bit risky, but Stuart Clark makes it work remarkably well.  The main focus of the book is of course scientists trying to understand the workings of the Sun, but Richard Carrington’s personal life had some noteworthy (and sometimes sordid) moments, and Britain’s astronomical community quite often sinks into some down-and-dirty politics.

 

    Fifteen photographs are included in the book, most of them from the 19th century and all of them interesting.  My favorite was astronomer Warren de la Rue’s 1860 "photoheliograph" of the sun totally eclipsed, showing multiple solar flares and slight depressions in the Sun’s horizon.  It’s absolutely fascinating.  There are also footnotes, usually giving anecdotal sidelights to something and conveniently placed at the bottom of the page, and well worth taking time to read.  One example is given in the second excerpt below.

 

    Sciency topics abound, many of which were new to me.  I was familiar with things like St. Elmo’s Fire, and how electrons were "found".  But it was enlightening to read about Ceres and Pallas being discovered; what Baily’s Beads are;  the probable causes of Europe’s “Little Ice Age”; and the havoc-wreaking appearance of the 2003 “Halloween Flares”.

 

Ratings…
    Amazon:  4.7/5 based on 79 ratings and 51 reviews.

    Goodreads: 4.15/5 based on 176 ratings and 31 reviews

 

Excerpts...

    One of Loomis’s early attempts at meteorology was to estimate tornado wind speeds in a rather macabre way.  A persistent prairie story was that chickens unlucky enough to be caught in tornados were often stripped of their feathers.  In 1842, Loomis chose several even unluckier chickens for his experiment.  He killed them and fired each carcass from a cannon.  His plan was to use different explosive charges so that each chicken would be propelled at a different velocity, then to examine each to see which had been stripped and which had remained feathered.  Things did not go quite according to plan.  He wrote, “My conclusions are that a chicken forced through the air with this velocity is torn entirely to pieces, so tornadoes likely possess wind speeds of less than the measured chicken speed of 341 miles per hour.”  (pg. 83)

 

    On 27 December 2004, the largest burst of gamma rays ever recorded cut through the solar system.  Smothered in the radiation, satellites instantly began transmitting alert messages to their masters on Earth.  As the torrent swept past our planet, part of it bounced off the Moon, and struck Earth again.  When astronomers triangulated the blast they found that it came not from the Sun but from deep space.  Tracing the blast backward, they found just one celestial object from which it could have originated: the supposed dead heart of a star, just twenty kilometers in diameter and lying some 50,000 light-years away.  (pg. 188)

 

Something strange had taken place on 1 September.  Something that had made the Earth’s natural cloak of magnetism quake.  (pg. 19)

    I can’t think of anything to gripe about in The Sun Kings.  I don’t recall any cusswords, but that’s to be expected for a scientific tome.  The text is only 189 pages long, but there were enough scientific topics discussed to where I wouldn’t call this a fast read.

 

    The Sun Kings fills a knowledge gap between the early days of the telescope (thank you, Galileo) and modern astronomy, where we now can view the universe from observatories orbiting in space.  The book also puts to rest any fears that Astronomy is a dead science in which everything “out there” has already been discovered and figured out.  As detailed in the second excerpt above, our Universe still has lots of surprises for anyone poking telescopes, cameras, and/or other monitoring devices at it.

 

    9½ Stars.  Here’s Herschel’s mind-boggling solution to the sunspot/weather correlation issue.  In his time, no one was recording daily temperature highs throughout the world.  But the yearly global market prices of wheat were available, because Adam Smith had listed them in his famous book The Wealth of Nations.

 

    Herschel reasoned that a high price of wheat indicated a meager crop that year, implying poor growing conditions.  He found that when sunspots were more numerous, wheat prices were generally lower, indicating the harvests were more bountiful.  Ergo, sunspots are good for Earth’s weather patterns, depressing the sun's heat and giving us calmer weather.  Sheer genius!

Monday, October 1, 2018

On Giants' Shoulders - Melvyn Bragg


   2009; 360 pages.  Full Title : On Giants’ Shoulders: Great Scientists and Their Discoveries, from Archimedes to DNA.  New Author? : No.    Genre : Non-Fiction, Science, Mathematics, Science History; Biography.  Overall Rating : 9*/10.

    I think it’s fair to label Melvyn Bragg a polymath.  Wikipedia lists him as being a broadcaster, a scriptwriter, an interviewer, a presenter, and a novelist.  He’s won 18 prestigious awards in these various areas, and his published writings include novels, non-fiction books, children’s books, and screenplays.  

    My friends in England tell me he’s a well-known TV personality; his career began in 1961, and continues even into the present, Mr. Bragg now being 78 years old.  I know of him from reading one of his non-fiction books back in 2016, titled “The Adventure of English” which is reviewed here

    As brilliant as he is, you’d think he’d be a nuclear physicist or a brain surgeon or something.  But in the introduction to this book, he confesses that he avoided anything even close to science throughout his schooling.

    But there came a day when he wondered if he was missing out on something by eschewing all things scientific.  After all, you never see an unhappy chemist, a math whiz who hates doing differential equations, or a physicist who’d rather be driving a truck.

    So he made it a point to look into a history and culture of Science.  He contacted some of the most eminent present-day scientists, and quizzed them to find out what made them tick.  He aired a series of programs on British radio, with the interviews and the feedback he received.  From there, he chose his personal top dozen scientists of all time, and asked his newly-befriended scientific peers what they thought of his choices.

    And then he wrote On Giants’ Shoulders so he could share his discoveries with the rest of us.

What’s To Like...
    Melvyn Bragg’s list of his 12 "greatest-ever" scientists, along with his sobriquets, is:

01.) Archimedes (287-212 BC) “The first Scientist”
02.) Galileo Galilei (1564-1642) “The Columbus of the Stars”
03.) Sir Isaac Newton (1642-1727) “Standing on the Shoulders of Giants”
04.) Antoine Lavoisier (1743-1797) “The Revolution does not need Scientists”
05.) Michael Faraday (1791-1867) “The Great Experimenter”
06.) Charles Darwin (1809-1882) “The Conservative Revolutionary”
07.) Jules Henri PoincarĂ© (1854-1912) “The Man who discovered Chaos by Accident”
08.) Sigmund Freud (1856-1939) “Science or Art?”
09.) Marie Curie (1867-1934) “A Woman’s Place is in the Lab”
10.) Albert Einstein (1879-1955) “The first Celebrity Scientist”
11. & 12.) Francis Crick (1914- ) & James Watson (1928- ) “The Meaning of Life”

    There’s also an introduction, where Bragg discloses that the book’s overall motif will be “Science for the non-scientist”, plus an “afterword” final chapter, in which the author and his science friends contemplate what might happen in the next hundred years of science.  For the record, since I am a chemist by profession, I’ve heard of all of the people on Bragg’s list, except #7 (“Chaos Theory”), #11, and #12 (“DNA”).

    This is not a science textbook.  Bragg has no intentions of teaching you how to replicate DNA, or the physics behind the theory of Multiverses.  Instead, he focuses on the impact each scientist’s work had on the world they lived in, and discusses with his colleagues questions like:  a.) What if said scientist had not made his major discovery?, b.) What kind of drive did that scientist have that led him to his breakthrough?, and c.) Upon whose shoulders was that scientist standing in order to make his discovery?

    Both the author and his contemporary scientist friends refrain from gushing over these twelve greats, and I liked that.  Einstein is called “lazy” by some, since he never bothered to prove any of his groundbreaking theories.  He merely wrote them down and left it to others to do the verifying.  Galileo’s famous trial by the Inquisition was not a “Science vs. Religion” issue, the Church was mad that he trashed the biblical “the Sun revolves around the Earth” theory while admitting he couldn’t disprove it.  Lavoisier, guillotined during the French Revolution, lost his head because he was a hated tax collector for the King, not because he was part of the nobility.  Darwin never once used the term “Evolution” in his writings; and the term “scientist” didn’t come into use until the 1830’s.

    On Giants’ Shoulders is written in English, not American, so you have plural maths, are educated in the sixth form (I still don’t know what that means), are sceptical, have fervour, and might contract leukaemia.  Melvyn Bragg starts each chapter with a page-long timeline for each scientist, along with a portrait.  Those extras were really neat.  Finally, despite the “heaviness” of the subject matter, I found the book to be a fast read.

Kewlest New Word ...
Fatuous (adj.) : Silly and pointless.
Others : Synoptic (adj.).

Excerpts...
    Faraday did not invent the electric motor.  Faraday did not invent the electric light bulb.  Faraday did not invent any particular technology and in fact Faraday himself would have been most horrified most probably at the imputation that he was a mere inventor.  As far as Faraday is concerned, he is a discoverer of great natural philosophical principles.  He is certainly not going to be engaged in the rather sordid business of inventing, which is something that craftsmen or entrepreneurs or people who are not gentlemen do.  (pg. 145)

    We are told that the universe came into existence about fifteen billion years ago with the Big Bang.  On our earth, for most of the four thousand million years it has been in existence, there was no living creature or thing.  If we equate the age of the earth to a twenty-four-hour day, the first signs of life appear after the twenty-third hour and human beings emerge in the last few minutes before midnight.
    The analogy of the clock is often used.  It seems to me to carry a fatal pessimism.  For when midnight strikes – is that not the Apocalypse, the end of everything?  Why could our few minutes not be the first of another fifteen billion year adventure?  (pg. 360)

 We are better at predicting events at the edge of the galaxy or inside the nucleus of an atom than whether it will rain on Aunty’s garden party three Sundays from now.  (pg. 187)
    I can't think of anything to quibble about in  On Giants’ Shoulders, but if you’re not of a scientific mentality, and/or don’t want to be, then reading chapter after chapter about  mostly dead mathematicians, physicists, astronomers, and chemists might get tedious.  Ditto if you were looking for someone who can make learning about Quantum Physics so easy a caveman can comprehend it.

    OTOH, there are some very interesting “speculative” questions about science posed, that are  worthy to be thought about.  Such as:

    If the (ancient) Greeks hadn’t invented science, would it have ever happened at all?  (pg. 16)
    If we razed the planet clean and started again, would Homo Sapiens inevitably turn up, or would it be purely a matter of chance?  (pg. 176)

   It's rather interesting to see the diversity in the answers that Bragg's science friends come up with.

    9 Stars.  On Giants’ Shoulders is my second Melvyn Bragg book, and I’ve thoroughly enjoyed both of them.  I haven’t ventured into his fiction books yet, but I'm now tempted to go out and try to find one, just to see if he is equally adept when making things up.