Showing posts with label drama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label drama. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 27, 2016

Coalescent - Stephen Baxter


   2004; 527 pages.  Book #1 (out of 4) in the Destiny’s Children series.  New Author? : No.  Genre : Historical Fiction; Drama; Mystery; a smidgen of Science Fiction.  Laurels: Nominated for the Arthur C. Clarke Award in 2004.  Overall Rating : 8*/10.

    It’s a somber occasion for George Poole.  His father has just died, and he’s the only one in the family left in England to return home and see to the estate.  Not that there’s much of an inheritance to split with the one other living relative, his older sister, Gina, who’s happily married and raising a family way over in Florida.

    But at least his boyhood chum, Peter McLachlan, is around to help go through dad’s few earthly possessions.  Peter’s kind of a weirdo, being heavily into SETI and other far-out groups who look for anomalies in outer space, to say nothing of extraterrestrials.  But it’ll be good to have someone there to help dispose of the family keepsakes.

    So it is quite to George’s surprise to learn he has a sister he’s never heard about.  A twin sister, no less.  Taken away (or more accurately, given away) soon after birth, and placed in some sort of religious order in Rome.

    Say, wasn’t there some sort of family legend about one of George’s many-times-great-grandmother (and wasn’t her name Regina?) also being involved with a religious order?  But that was 15 centuries ago, back in the days right after the Roman Legions abandoned England.  Surely there’s no connection, right?

    Hmmm.

What’s To Like...
    Coalescent is yet another ambitious effort by Stephen Baxter, with four storylines and genres involving untold millennia cleverly interwoven into an overarching Poole family saga.  There’s a present-day story, one of Intrigue, that follows George’s efforts to locate his long-lost twin sister. There’s a Historical Fiction account of the legendary Regina.  There’s a Drama plotline involving a girl named Lucia, who wants out of her present-day situation in Rome.  And late in the novel, there’s a very small Science Fiction thread that takes place far in the future. 

    Personally, my favorite thread was Regina’s story, as all of Western Europe, and England especially, fall into the Dark Ages after the collapse of the Roman Empire.  Stephen Baxter’s attention to detail in this is impressive, and I liked that he went with gritty realism, as opposed to some King Arthur type of fantasy tale. I enjoyed learning about the “Wall Walk”, some nominal contact with Druids, and even a brief mention of an ancient religion near and dear to my heart – Mithraism.

    Life was tough in those first years after the fall of Rome.  So if frequent cussing isn’t your cup of tea, or you find things like rape, oral sex, slavery, homosexuality, and ritual procreation offensive, you might want to skip this book.

    The unifying theme to the book is Baxter’s hypothesis that societies – be they insects, mammals, or even humans – when placed in extremely stressful and existence-threatening conditions, will adapt a “hive mentality”, where everyone has a predetermined role that needs no explaining, and does it without fail or question.  The individual members of such a society won’t even be aware of this collective mentality, they will just naturally coalesce into it, hence the book’s title.  The three favorite maxims within the Order are “Ignorance is Strength”; “Listen to your Sisters”, and (most importantly) “Sisters matter more than Daughters”.

    The ending ties these disparate storylines together, with a twist or two to keep you on your toes.  This is a standalone novel, but several loose threads remain afterward (most notably, the Kuiper Belt Anomaly), which presumably pave the way for the sequel and the rest of the series.

 Kewlest New Word...
Eusocial (adj.) : of an animal species (usually insects) showing an advanced level of social organization, in which a single female or caste produces the offspring and non-reproductive individual cooperate in caring for the young.
Others : Extirpating (v.); Intaglio (n.).


Excerpts...
    Rosa leaned forward and said softly, “Mamma- Mamma-“
    Maria looked up blearily, her eyes rheumy grey pebbles.  “What, what?  Who’s that?  Oh, it’s you, Rosa Poole.”  She glanced down at her book irritably, tried to focus, then closed the book with a sigh.  “Oh, never mind.  I always thought old age would at least give me time to read.  But by the time I’ve got to the bottom of the page I’ve forgotten what was at the top …”  She leered at Lucia, showing a toothless mouth.  “What an irony – eh?”  (pg. 232)

    “No Renaissance.  There would have been no need for it.  But there would have been none of the famous Anglo-Saxon tradition of individual liberty and self-determination.  No Magna Carta, no parliaments.  If the Romans had gone to the Americas they wouldn’t have practiced genocide against the natives, as we did.  That wasn’t the Roman way.  They’d have assimilated, acculturated, built their aqueducts and bathhouses and roads, the apparatus of their civilizing system.  The indigenous nations, in North and South America, would have survived as new Roman provinces.  It would have a richer world, maybe more advanced in some ways.”
    “But no Declaration of Independence.  And no abolition of slavery, either.”  (pg. 416)

 “Honesty doesn’t excuse ignorance.  But it helps.”  (pg. 504)
    For all its lofty aspirations, Coalescent doesn’t quite …um… coalesce into a smooth, seamless story.  First and foremost, the pacing is uneven.  The initial storyline, George’s search for his sister, moves much too slow, and takes a hundred+ page sabbatical in the middle of the book while waiting for the Lucia thread to catch up.  The Regina storyline ends early – well, she had to die sometime – and is sustained only by some sparse, interesting, but ultimately unrelated temporal updates about the Order’s activities.  And the futuristic plotline is woefully short, sparsely developed, and seems to exist only to give a glimpse of the sequels.

    To boot, there simply isn’t much Science Fiction here, and those who read Stephen Baxter novels for that genre are going to be disappointed.  OTOH, those, like me, whose favorite Baxter book is Evolution (reviewed here) will find one or more story threads in this book to be quite interesting.

    These would be some serious drawbacks, if it were not for Stephen Baxter being one heckuva an accomplished writer.  Hey, he kept me interested in the Drama storyline, and that’s not a genre that I'm particularly fond of.

    Overall, I found Coalescent to be a good, but not great effort by Baxter.  This may change depending of how well I like the sequel, Exultant, which sits within my Kindle, waiting to be read.

    8 Stars.  Add ½ star if the phrase “Kuiper Belt Anomaly” piques your science-fiction interest.  I have a feeling it plays an integral part in the rest of the books in this series.

Saturday, February 14, 2015

Vine: An Urban Legend - Michael Williams


    2012; 192 pages.  New Author? : Yes.  Genre : Contemporary Fiction; Drama.  Overall Rating : 5½*/10.

    Stephen Thorne has decided to stage a play.   It is an ambitious undertaking – he wants to do an ancient Greek play called The Bacchae, and to stage it in Louisville, Kentucky, which happens to be Thorne’s old stomping grounds.

    There is some competition – the nearby Baptist church is also working on putting on the play Our Town, and there are only so many people in Louisville with thespian aspirations.  But there are old acquaintances, and old flames, that Stephen can call upon to staff the cast and its understudies.

    Interestingly, some of the old Greek deities have gotten wind of Stephen’s endeavor. In particular, the nine Muses have taken a keen interest in it.  Unfortunately, when Greek gods/goddesses meddle in the affairs of humankind, it’s almost always bad news for the mortals.

What’s To Like...
    If you’re a Greek mythology buff (and I am), Vine : An Urban Legend will be a real treat.  In addition to the meddling Muses and main gods and goddesses, a bunch of minor myths are referenced, a lot of which I’d either forgotten or never heard of.

    The same applies if you’re a Greek theater buff (and I’m not).  Michael Williams deliberately patterns the story in “ancient Greek play” format, including the Muses (and later, some of Louisville’s finest riffraff) as the requisite Chorus/Narrators.  I especially liked the way V:AUL is gradually subsumed by The Bacchae – the story about a play becomes a play within a play.

    If you delight in new vocabulary words, this book will knock your socks off.  Williams is not shy about using obsolete or obscure words.  In lesser hands this could be tedious, but it works nicely here.  There is some subtle humor as well; including T. Tommy’s “Brischords” and an abductee who becomes somewhat of a PITA for his abductors.

    There are some nice contemporary cultural references.  It’s been a while since I’ve seen the I Ching play a significant role in a book; ditto for Dungeons & Dragons.  And anything that pokes fun at Our Town is a plus.   I had to sit through it once way back in High School.  It was boring as all get out.

    The characters are a pleasant lot, but not particularly memorable.  There is a very mild love triangle for those who like some romance in their readings.  Some of the language is R-Rated, but not to an excessive degree.  The ending is only so-so, but I suspect this is the way Greek plays are structured.  Pages-wise, the book is short, but I wouldn’t call it a quick read, thanks to the play-like format and the challenging vocabulary.

Kewlest New Word…
    There were a slew of high-falutin’ words in the book.  Among the best were :
    Callipygian (adj.) : Having well-shaped buttocks.
    Others : Krater (n.); Insufflation  (n.); Empurpurated (v.); Piriform (adj.); Aleatory (adj.); Anagnoritic (adj.); Marmoreal (adj.).  I never did figure out a clear-cut meaning for Empurpurated.

Excerpts...
    “Thunder grass: dope that creeps up on you, rumbles at your horizons, then climbs the back of your neck, sending warm consolation from your jaw to your ears and occipital, displacing you and paling the light by the courtside fountain until it becomes a summons to false bravery, a walk in the park in the dead of night when a man of 63 is subject to all dangers, from muggery to buggery to drowsing satyrs to coiled dragons guarding unspeakable treasure.”  (loc. 371)

    Girls liked Jack, and there was something about him: he would stand well in the chorus, perhaps even lead it.
    You have completely forgotten, Aron replied, that the chorus is women, and even if Jack Rausch likes that kind of thing I can’t imagine our chorus leader in drag…
    To which the boys all laughed, reminding him that his was Euripides, that the women in Greek drama were played by men.  (loc. 3535)

Kindle Details...
    Vine:  An Urban Legend sells for $2.99 at Amazon.  It appears it is “this” Michael Williams’s only offering for the Kindle.

”Sometimes you eat the god. … And sometimes the god eats you. ”  (loc. 5324)
    For all its pluses, Vine: An Urban Legend has one major shortcoming – the pacing is incredibly slow.  Basically, nothing happens until the book is half over.  A brief, spoiler-free summary:

    0%-50% : Introduction of the characters.
    50%-80% : An attempted abduction, which fails miserably when the abductee comes along willingly.
    80%-90% : A mysterious disappearance, never fully resolved.
    90%-100% : Action!  Bloodshed!

   I’m guessing once again that this mimics classic Greek tragedies in general, and The Bacchae in particular.  However, the average, non-OCD reader will probably give up on the book long before the excitement commences.

    Which is a shame, since the elements of this tale : cavorting gods, challenging vocabulary, homage to Euripides, and reality blurring with myth – are an innovative, ambitious, and alluring mix.

    5½ Stars.  Add 2 stars if you are a fan of Euripides and have read The Bacchae.  I read the Wikipedia article on the play after finishing Vine, and wished I had done so beforehand.  Subtract 1 star if Greek gods and playwrights bore you to tears.   

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

Galileo - Bertolt Brecht


1966; 150 pages {8-41 : Introduction; 42-129 is the play itself; 133-150 : "Writing The Truth - Five Difficulties", an essay by Bertolt Brecht}. Genre : Dramatic Play. Overall Rating : C+ (the play rates a "B"; the rest rates a "D").

   .The book's plot centers around Galileo's invention (or more accurately, his plagiarism) of the telescope, and the impact this had on himself and on various institutions.

What's To Like...
    Brecht gives a very even-handed presentation of Galileo-the-scientist, and Science-the profession. Being a chemist, it was interesting to me to see these two topics in such a light. In the play, there are a wide variety of responses to the introduction of the telescope.

    .For Galileo, it starts out as simply a money-maker. He is told about the Dutch already producing small telescopes, and he duplicates the design and sells it to the city of Venice as if it were his own idea. Later, he uses it to observe the moon and planets, and discovers that Aristotle was wrong - the earth revolves around the sun; not vice versa.

   .The city officials are only concerned with its marketabiity. It is seen as an amusement at best, or else a device for Peeping Toms. The government sees it as a military breakthrough - they will now be able to spot enemy fleets hours before those fleets see them. The church couldn't care one way or the other, unless it contradicts Scripture, and their interpretation thereof. The latter of course leads to a sharp conflict between the Astronomer and Rome.

What's Not To Like...
    In a word, the Introduction, written by one Eric Bentley, sucks. Here's his first sentence :

    "Brecht was all wrong about the seventeenth centruy in general and about Galileo Galilei in particular."
    Wow! That really makes you want to read the book, eh? Bentley then spends 40 more boring pages, using Miltonesque verbiage, telling you why he's miffed at Brecht. In the end, it boils down to this : Brecht's Galileo isn't noble enough for Bentley. This one is a plagiarist, naive, and when it comes to facing the Inquisition's "methods", quite the coward.

    .Sorry, Eric. In Galileo, Brecht is exploring the inevitable tension between dogmatism and the search for truth. It's not meant to be historically accurate, any more than, say, Shakespeare's Julius Caesar. Get over it.
.
    Oh, and the epilogic essay by Brecht is boring too.
.
A word or two about Bertolt Brecht...
    Brecht (1898-1956) was born in Germany and was a lifelong Marxist and outspoken anti-Fascist. The latter appellation became hazardous to his health as Hitler came to power in the 1930's. So he chose to emigrate, but Hitler kept invading countries, necessitating multiple moves by Brecht. He went from Germany to Denmark, then to Sweden, then to Finland, and then to the USA. Here, as a self-proclaimed Marxist, he ended up being a target of the House of Un-American Activities. So his final move was (back) to East Germany. All because of his beliefs. Which is quite sad. Freedom-of-thought is ever the bane of dogma.
.
    But I digress. I enjoyed Galileo, and even read it twice. Partly to better grasp the themes of the book, and partly cuz it was only 80 pages long. If you believe the Pope is infallible, or that Seeking After Truth is as noble an endeavor as you can have (and I fall into that latter category), then this book will challenge your beliefs.