2017;
262 pages. Full Title : The Grouchy Historian: An Old-Time Lefty Defends Our
Constitution Against Right-Wing Hypocrites and Nutjobs. New Author? : Yes. Genre : Politics, Commentary. Overall Rating : 8*/10.
Quick. Tell me everything you know about the United
States Constitution.
Hmm. Well, it was given by God
Herself to our Founding Fathers. It
starts out “We, the People”. No, wait; that was the Declaration of
Independence.
Not bad.
When was it written?
A long
time ago. I think they wrote it the same
time as they did the Declaration of Independence. In fact, now that I think about it, I think
the Declaration of Independence is the preamble to the Constitution. Whatever a preamble is.
What about the Amendments?
I forgot about those. Despite
being an infallible document, God, in Her Graciousness, allowed us to make some
changes to the Constitution. The most
important Amendment allowed us to get drunk again, after an earlier one said we
couldn’t. The other important one is the
Second Amendment, which says everyone should carry an assault rifle with him at
all times.
You’re amazing. One last question. What about the Bill of Rights?
Oh,
I forgot about those too. I’m pretty sure
it was written at the same time as the Declaration of Independence and the
Constitution. It gives us the right to
Life, Liberty, and the Happiness of Pursuit.
And a couple other things.
Including assault rifles. And
slaves.
You are truly in a class by yourself when it
comes to American History. Can I
interest you in Ed Asner’s new book, The
Grouchy Historian?
What’s To Like...
Ed Asner is an outspoken and unashamed voice
for the Political Left, and The Grouchy Historian
details his study and research into the history and content of the United States Constitution. In fairness, he admits at
the very beginning of the book that he is politically biased, and thus he is
not presenting “both sides” of the debate.
Instead, he is an unabashed apologist for the Left, addressing and
refuting the various skewed assertions proffered to us by the titular
Right-Wing Hypocrites and Nutjobs.
The
book consists of 24 chapters covering 262 pages of text, plus another 73 pages
of extras that includes notes, a bibliography, acknowledgements, and the full
text of the Constitution itself and all the Amendments. If you want to double-check anything that Ed
Asner asserts, it is easy to do.
The main topics are separated into seven sections, namely:
1.
The Constitutional Convention – Who was there and when they met. (Chs. 2-3)
2.
God and the Constitution. (Chs. 5-6)
3.
The Writing of the Constitution. (Chs.
7-9)
4.
The Amendments: Ed’s Open Letters to prominent Right-Wing Nut-Jobs. (Chs. 11-14)
5.
The Bill of Rights. (Chs. 15-16)
6.
The Supreme Court Right-Wing Nut Jobs.
(Chs. 18-21)
7.
The Second Amendment: Guns and the NRA.
(Ch. 23)
The other chapters are dribs and drabs of information that Ed Asner
found intriguing, but which didn’t fit into any of those seven broader
categories. The book lists one Ed
Weinberger as a co-author. It is unclear
what role he plays; I suspect he took the points Asner wanted to make and
polished them into a readable form.
I
enjoyed the writing style – it’s a folksy, easy-to-read sort, that kept the
contentious subject matter light and oftentimes amusing. This also made the book a fast read, so if
you need to do a book report for Civics class, and it’s due tomorrow, this may
be your saving grace.
The
literary format is varied, which kept things from bogging down. The writing of the Constitution is presented
as a diary of one of James Madison’s slaves.
The Amendments section includes Ed presenting some of the right-wing
proposals, balanced by some of his own. The
section about the American eugenics experiment (pg. 180) and the chapter about how often the Bill of Rights failed to protect citizens are both sobering and scary.
Excerpts...
For the record: I
do not pretend that what I say here is an objective study of the Constitution
and the men and events that went into its creation. I come to the subject as a citizen with my
own strong point of view, believing that “objective historian” is a
contradiction in terms, like “compassionate conservative” or “Fox News”. (pg. 5)
An early example
of how natural law was used can be found in Bradwell
v. Illinois (1873), a Supreme Court case in which Myra Bradwell had been
denied admission to the Illinois State Bar because she was a woman. The Supreme Court upheld the lower court’s ruling, its Chief Justice stating:
“ …that God
designed the sexes to occupy different spheres of action, and that it belonged
to men to make, apply and execute the laws, was regarded as an almost axiomatic
truth.”
Which goes to
show how stupid you can be when you’re sure you know what God is up to. (pg. 212)
“Scalia’s cultivated vision
of the Constitution made him unquestionably one of the great minds of the
thirteenth century.” (pg.
208 )
There
are some quibbles. First, while I
enjoyed learning the author’s points-of-view, if you happen to be of the
right-wing persuasion, you will probably hate those very things. However, you can’t say Ed doesn’t warn you
about this, and right at the very beginning.
Similarly, he can get quite snarky at times, particularly when talking
about the nut-jobs. Since that’s the right-wingers’ favorite strategy
when dealing with us liberals, there is a certain amount of karmic satisfaction
here. But it also feels a little like
we’re mud-wrestling with pigs when we adopt their same dirty tactics.
Finally, Chapter 8, wherein Ed gives short biographies of all 55 Framers
of the Constitution, can get tedious and repetitive. See the next paragraph for why. Ed recognizes this, and gives the reader
permission to skip this chapter if it bogs down. I read the whole chapter anyway, but feel free to take him up on this
offer after reading the first couple bios.
They don’t vary much from there on.
8 Stars.
Highly informative and highly
recommended. If I had to sum up Ed
Asner’s main hypothesis in The Grouchy Historian,
it would be that those who wrote the Constitution did so to further their own
fortunes (they
were all rich white businessmen, whose fortunes depended heavily on speculating
on frontier lands and near-worthless IOUs from the Revolutionary War).
And that the right-wingers who champion
it today are doing the same.