2017; 467 pages. Book 9 (out of 14) in the series “The Chronicles of St. Mary’s”. New Author? : No. Genres: Time Travel; Humorous Fantasy; Historical
Fiction. Overall Rating: 8½*/10.
It’s sad that it took so long.
The Institute of Historical
Research at St. Mary’s and the chrono-hopping law enforcement agency known as
the Time Police share a common foe: Clive Ronan. But thus far, the two groups have done too much
fighting between themselves to even think about going after Clive.
Until now. The head of St. Mary's History Department, “Max” Maxwell has come up with a
plan. It’s risky, and hinges on Ronan’s
insatiable greed for historical treasures, but it just might work. And St. Mary’s and the Time Police will both play
key roles in it. All they have to do is
cooperate with each other.
And hope that Clive
Ronan takes the bait.
What’s To Like...
An Argumentation
of Historians is the ninth book in Jodi Taylor’s series
showcasing the time-traveling adventures of St. Mary’s historians. One of the many reasons I’m hooked on this
series is that there are always a bunch of time-jumps in the stories, many involving
historically fascinating events.
This book is no exception; St.
Mary’s personnel make six time-jumps, three of which are for historical
witnessing and recording, including one centered on one of my history idols,
Alexander the Great. The other three are
done for personal survival reasons including one extended visit to 1399 CE, where
Max, along with the reader, learn how to live day-to-day in
Medieval times. It was an enlightening
experience.
The text is written in the
first-person POV, Max’s. It is also
written in English, not American, which means we Yanks will encounter odd
spellings, such as wilfully and pedlar, and odd words, such as knackered and swive. I love learning foreign languages. The “Author’s Note” at the book’s beginning
is worth taking time to read, and as always, the Dramatis
Thingummy is both useful and entertaining.
It’s always a treat when
Adrian and Mikey show up at St. Mary's in their 12-foot-high teapot. The acronym FOD
was new to me; it’s the term time-travelers use for the occupational peril "Foreign Object Drop". The question of “do
Medieval castle gate open inward or outward” is examined by St.
Mary’s historians, and the reader learns why this is an important detail. It was also educational to learn the specific
duties of a courtesan.
The ending is twisty (is there a traitor in our midst?), exciting (fighting on rooftops), tense (falling from rooftops), and revealing (how does Clive Ronan anticipate every move of St. Mary's). In short, it is superb.
Ratings…
Amazon: 4.7*/5, based on 6,260 ratings
and 470 reviews.
Goodreads: 4.52*/5,
based on 8,645
ratings and 671 reviews.
Excerpts...
“You appear to be setting up a scenario in
which you almost invite Clive Ronan to swoop in and shoot you.”
“Yes, sir,”
“You don’t think that’s a little —
obvious?”
I can’t help it. I’m a showman, too.
I brought up the second part of my plan.
He read it through. And read it through again. And read it through for a final time. I waited patiently because every reading was
a step nearer acceptance. Finally, he
looked over his desk at me.
“I might find it quite difficult to apply
the word “unoriginal” to this part of your proposed plan.”
“Thank you, sir.”
“That wasn’t a compliment.” (pg. 60)
“I don’t want any visitors.”
“Just as well,” she said cheerfully, laying
out pyjamas and a dressing gown. “You’re
not allowed any.”
I was unreasonably annoyed because that was
supposed to be my decision. “Who said
so?”
“Dr. Stone.
He’s waiting for you if you want to go out and argue with him.”
I humphed.
I’ve argued with Dr. Stone before.
It’s like trying to fill a bath without a plug. There’s an enormous amount of effort and when
you finally pause to get your breath back, absolutely nothing has happened and
you realise you’ve been wasting your time. (pg. 360)
Kewlest New Word ...
Caparisoned
(adj.) : decked out in rich,
decorative coverings
Others: Swive (archaic).
You could have
heard a slipper-wearing mouse dance the fandango on a feather cushion. (pg. 129)
The profanity is pretty sparse
in An Argumentation of Historians, just 17 instances in the first 50% of
the book, about half of which were the common scatological term.
There was a smattering of
typos, most of which were things I’d have thought Spellchecker would catch. Examples include: top/stop,
ever/every, and of/off. I’ll excuse Spellchecker for missing the two
spellings of one of the characters: Midgely/
Midgeley.
But enough of the
nitpicking. An Argumentation of
Historians maintains the usual high standards of a Jodi Taylor novel:
fast-paced, action-packed, historically-detailed, and lots of
time-traveling. This was part of a
ten-volume paperback bundle given to me as a Christmas present by a friend a
few years back. I’m 90% of the way
through it and have never yet been disappointed.
8½ Stars. One last thing. Here’s a poser for anyone who has time-traveling acquaintances. What’s the best method of communicating with someone who lives in the future? Answer in the comments.
1 comment:
ANSWER: Write them a letter, and send it to a discreetly coded PO Box address. Anything electronic or computer-related is not recommended. Reasons why are given on pages 67-68 of the book.
Post a Comment