2016;
354 pages (includes prologue and timeline). Full Title : Paper
– Paging Through History. New
Author? : No. Genre : Non-Fiction; Technology;
World History. Overall Rating : 8*/10.
Mark Kurlansky poses an interesting question
at the start of Paper: What do humans do that other animals do not?
At
first thought, that might seem like an easy question, but finding an answer may
take a bit more time than you’d think.
Yes, our opposable thumbs give us all sorts of dexterity advantages, but
lots of other animals have them too: apes, of course, but also pandas, opossums, certain frogs; and some birds, although the latter's is merely an opposable digit. And as for the skills our thumbs
enable us to do – carrying, climbing, grasping, holding, etc. – creatures
without thumbs can also do all of these.
We
humans can build things, and alter our environment, but the author points out
that so does a beaver when he builds a dam.
We wage war against others of our species, but so do ants. We can laugh, play, and joke around, but so
do cats. We communicate with one
another, but so do bees, wolves, and monkeys.
No, the one thing that sets us apart is our desire, and our ability, to
record. We’ve been doing it since we
were living in caves – drawing glyphs on walls, making scribbles on rocks, and
eventually scratching grooves into clay tablets.
But those are all painstaking ways of leaving a message. So it’s not surprising that mankind came up (independently, and
in several locations in both global hempisheres) with an easier
medium to leave marks on: Paper.
What’s To Like...
The book’s title might seem misleading to
some, as paper has hundreds of uses (gift-wrapping, tissues, toilet paper, etc.) most
of which only receive passing mention here.
Mark Kurlansky focuses mainly on paper being used for communicating or
for artistic efforts. He also examines
paper’s forerunners (clay tablets à papyrus à parchment à paper), and
its purported replacement (paper à e-mail).
Throughout the book, and especially in the chapters covering the distant
past, World History gets just as much ink as Papermaking Technology, and I
greatly enjoyed that.
Paper is divided into 18 chapters, plus a prologue
and an epilogue. The earlier chapters
are a nice mix of chronological and geographical happenings, covering the
various places when and where alphabets, writing, and drawing developed. Such inventions spurred the need for something to write upon and devices to print with. Once we hit modern times (around Chapter 14) the theme switches to technological advances, such as the birth of photography
and the encyclopedia, new raw materials for papermaking, innovative uses
for paper, how the paper industry copes with present-day environmental issues,
and last-but-not-least, e-books.
I
was impressed by just how many raw materials have been used for making
paper. Some of the main ones are: flax,
cotton, rags, bark, silk, linen, hemp, jute, bamboo, agave, trees, seaweed,
esparto grass, abaca, and scraps from sugar cane harvesting. Rags may seem out of place in that list,
but it was actually the major starting material used in America to make paper for hundreds of
years.
The
book is a trivia buff’s delight. Some of
the things mentioned that resonated with me are:
Jackson Pollock, Moses Maimonides, Li Po, and
Fibonacci (four of my personal heroes)
1001 Arabian Nights (Kurlansky claims it is “essentially erotic literature”)
Pencils
(first
made in England in 1565)
Book Fairs!
(first
held in 1541)
Haiku and Origami (I’ve written some Haiku, and am fascinated by Origami)
Calligraphy
(I practiced
writing Chinese characters when studying Mandarin)
The Kraft Process and the Sulphite
Process (my company sells products for these)
Baseball Cards! (I had thousands as a kid)
The Iliad and the Odyssey (I will probably read one or both of these later this
year)
Massachusetts (named for a dialect of the Algonquin language)
Chiaroscuro
(say
what?)
There
are some kewl drawings spread throughout the book. The extras in the back include a Timeline, Acknowledgements, and extensive Bibliography,
and a 25-page Index. Mark
Kurlansky has written a series of historical non-fiction books with one-word
titles. I’ve read two (“1968” and now this one), and have two more (“Cod” and “Salt”) waiting on my Kindle. Based on
Amazon and Goodreads reviews, those latter two are regarded as the author’s best
efforts, so I’m looking forward to reading them.
Kewlest New Word…
Xylographer (n.)
: a person who makes engravings on wood, especially for printing.
Excerpts...
These small,
portable books, which Aldus called libelli
portatiles, are credited with changing people’s reading habits. This, of course, is the technological fallacy
at work once again. Aldus did not change
reading habits. Rather, a change in
reading habits prompted him to produce a different kind of book. He could see that books were too big for the
way new readers wanted to use them.
Books were no longer read only by learned monks and scholars at stands
in monasteries and castles but by a broad range of people, especially in Italy
and France. People wanted to read while
lounging in chairs at a café; they wanted to take books to work to read on
breaks or on trips. (pg. 137)
The expansion in
reading was not simply a by-product of the revolutions in France and America,
but a widespread phenomenon. It could
even be argued, as Diderot did, that the spread of reading and its accompanying
spread of knowledge led to rebellion against the old order. This was why that old order, the
aristocracies and clergy of Europe, were tremendously fearful of this
increasing popularity of books and newspapers and reading in general. In the late eighteenth century, people of all
economic classes, rural and urban, the well educated and the little educated,
men and women, young and old – everyone started reading more. (pg. 237)
I
don’t really have any quibbles with Paper,
but have to admit that at times - mostly during the technical passages - it was a bit of a slog to read. I don’t think this is in any way the fault of
the author; this is my second Mark Kurlansky book, and his writing skills are
fantastic.
Instead,
I blame the subject matter. I suspect it
is difficult to make the manufacture of paper an exciting topic due to its
inherently technical nature.
I
can relate. I once had to write a 200-word
essay on “Mining
in Siberia”. I was being
disciplined for some sort of transgression in junior high, this was before
there was anything like Google, Wikipedia, and the Internet, and it certainly didn't merit a special trip to the city library. My only resource was the encyclopedia at the
junior high school library, which, not surprisingly, had very few words to say about the subject. It was an extremely
time-consuming piece of penance, accomplished only by me getting very wordy and spreading a lot
of bullsh*t in my essay.
That was 200 words about Russian mining. This book is 350 pages about making paper. I’d love to
know what Mark Kurlansky’s thoughts were as he sat down to write this book.
8 Stars.
Let’s close this review with a pair of
trivia questions from Paper; one serious,
the other more tongue-in-cheek. 1.) What was the
world’s first novel and when was it published? 2.) What, according to Pliny, are humans incapable of doing that other (similarly
equipped) animals can?
(Answers in the Comments section.)
1 comment:
ANSWERS: 1.) Don Quixote, Man of la Mancha in 1605. 2.) Move their ears.
Post a Comment